<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Research Enterprise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rtei.org/blog/index.php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rtei.org/blog</link>
	<description>Technology transfer, intellectual property, and cockroach living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Simple, Clear Model University IP and Consulting Policies</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/simple-clear-model-university-ip-and-consulting-policies/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/simple-clear-model-university-ip-and-consulting-policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That last post was no fun at all.  I hope you skipped it.  It just documents how bad stuff is so no one can feign that it looks pretty good, really.  No matter.  Perhaps long IP policies are doomed.  If &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/simple-clear-model-university-ip-and-consulting-policies/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/simple-clear-model-university-ip-and-consulting-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A compulsory policy so messed up, it must be voluntary!</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/a-compulsory-policy-so-messed-up-it-must-be-voluntary/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/a-compulsory-policy-so-messed-up-it-must-be-voluntary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Present Assignment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[11.  The present assignment is so incompetently constructed it boggles the mind. In a prior post, I included the above in a list of problems with UW&#8217;s implementation of present assignments.  I added this one because, well, UW&#8217;s &#8220;goes to &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/a-compulsory-policy-so-messed-up-it-must-be-voluntary/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/a-compulsory-policy-so-messed-up-it-must-be-voluntary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 Points on the *UW* Present Assignment Requirement</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/7-points-on-the-uw-present-assignment-requirement/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/7-points-on-the-uw-present-assignment-requirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Present Assignment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been some discussion going on about the recent UC UW requirement that everyone sign a new patent acknowledgement outside work request form, this one with a present assignment in it, with the claim that this change is needed &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/7-points-on-the-uw-present-assignment-requirement/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/7-points-on-the-uw-present-assignment-requirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research Veering in the Public Interest</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/research-veering-in-the-public-interest/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/research-veering-in-the-public-interest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sponsored Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you see this story in the New York Times yesterday?  &#8221;Sloan-Kettering Chief Is Accused of Taking Research&#8221;.   Craig Thompson, who worked at a research institute affiliated with University of Pennsylvania, starts a company, Agios, and now is being &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/research-veering-in-the-public-interest/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/07/research-veering-in-the-public-interest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Practical Lessons for University Counsel</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/practical-lessons-for-university-counsel/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/practical-lessons-for-university-counsel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bayh-Dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford v Roche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a typical slide deck (it opens in PowerPoint&#8211;sorry non-&#8217;Softies) talking about Stanford v Roche and offering lessons learned.  It looks like it was prepared by the University of Rochester&#8217;s Office of General Counsel. It does a nice job on &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/practical-lessons-for-university-counsel/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/practical-lessons-for-university-counsel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SB 6542 in Star Trek</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/sb-6542-in-star-trek/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/sb-6542-in-star-trek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Present Assignment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SB 6542 will force universities to a voluntary IP program, and is being opposed by administrators who believe it is a virtue to place institutional self-interest ahead of individual liberty&#8230;.  Translated into Star Trek (TOS), it&#8217;s something like this: [The &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/sb-6542-in-star-trek/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/sb-6542-in-star-trek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Central Control of Research Innovation</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/on-the-central-control-of-research-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/on-the-central-control-of-research-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D Printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Present Assignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global University Venturing has published an essay that explores yet another aspect of the present assignment situation, exploring the effect of institutional claims on the dynamics of innovation.  In the essay I try to put in the context the arguments &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/on-the-central-control-of-research-innovation/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/on-the-central-control-of-research-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When public mission = money</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/when-public-mission-money/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/when-public-mission-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Present Assignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been emphasizing organizational conflict of interest.  Most universities have no policy on such things, and therefore technology transfer has been allowed to make a transition from a broadly faculty-led activity with a diversity of practices reflecting the range &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/when-public-mission-money/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/06/when-public-mission-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Bill 6542:  Innovation Bill of Rights</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/04/senate-bill-6542-innovation-bill-of-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/04/senate-bill-6542-innovation-bill-of-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford v Roche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/04/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator Maralyn Chase has introduced a bill in the Washington State senate that would prohibit public universities from making compulsory claims of ownership of intellectual property based on employment or use of facilities unless required by a sponsor of research. &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/04/senate-bill-6542-innovation-bill-of-rights/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/04/senate-bill-6542-innovation-bill-of-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ownership vs Stewardship, Fictionally Speaking</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/02/ownership-vs-stewardship-fictionally-speaking/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/02/ownership-vs-stewardship-fictionally-speaking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bozonet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/02/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a perspective piece on ownership, stewardship, and Bayh-Dole after Stanford v Roche that has been published in Genetic Engineering &#38; Biotechnology News.  I thought I would put a link here if folks wanted to see it. Everyone talks &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/02/ownership-vs-stewardship-fictionally-speaking/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/02/02/ownership-vs-stewardship-fictionally-speaking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

